SRI
  • WHO WE ARE
    • ABOUT SRI
    • WRITE FOR US
  • NEWS
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Americas
    • Europe
    • Kashmir
    • Middle East
    • Pakistan
    • World
  • ARTICLES
    • BLOG
    • RESEARCH ARTICLES
  • INFOGRAPHICS
    • Constitutional Amendment
    • Covid-19
    • Dams
    • Economy
    • Environment
    • Fact of the day
    • Global Facts and Statistics
    • History through lens
    • Israel Attack
    • Kashmir
    • Learn the term
    • Middle East
    • Military
    • Nuclear
    • Pakistan
    • Personality
    • Quote of the day
    • Space
    • Theory Thursday
    • Today in history
    • Women in international world
  • WEB INFOGRAPHICS
  • CONTACT US
Font ResizerAa
SRISRI
Search
  • INFOGRAPHICS
  • WEB INFOGRAPHICS
  • ARTICLES
  • NEWS
    • Asia
    • Pakistan
    • Americas
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • World
    • Ukraine crisis
Follow US
Copyright © 2024 Strategic Research institute
NEWSWorld

Casualties in Afghanistan, Iraq much higher than the US admitted: NYT

SRI NewsDesk
By SRI NewsDesk Published December 21, 2021
Share

WASHINGTON: Data collected after times of action and months of disquisition converted The New York Times to conclude that mercenary casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan were much advanced than the United States ever conceded.

Casting up its sweats to probe the US wars in the lesser Middle East region, the review wrote “ The pledge was a war waged by all-seeing drones and perfection losers.” But the documents NYT attained showed “ defective intelligence, defective targeting, times of mercenary deaths — and spare responsibility”.

The review got access to the Pentagon documents about the war through Freedom of Information requests beginning in March 2017 and suits filed against the US Defence Department and the Central Command.

NYT journalists also visited further than 100 casualty spots and canvassed scores of surviving residers and current and former American officers. The findings, published this week in a two-part report, revealed that the US air war was “ deeply defective” and the number of mercenary deaths had been “ drastically undercounted”, by at least several hundred, NYT reported.

The document contradicted the Pentagon’s claim that the drone technology made it possible to destroy a part of a house filled with adversary fighters while leaving the rest of the structure standing. The NYT report revealed that over a five-time period, US forces executed further than airstrikes in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, with much lower than the announced perfection.

Read: 9/11 survivors want Afghanistan’s $7bn funds in the US paid as compensation

Noting that before launching airstrikes the service must navigate elaborate protocols to estimate and minimize mercenary deaths, the report conceded that frequently available intelligence “ can mislead, fall suddenly, or at times lead to disastrous crimes”.

The review refocused out that occasionally vids shot from the air didn’t show people in structures, under leafage or under tarpaulins or aluminum covers. Either, “ available data can be misinterpreted, as when people running to a fresh bombing point are assumed to be zealots, not would-be saviors”, the report added.

“ Occasionally men on motorcycles moving in conformation’, displaying the‘ hand of an imminent attack, were just men on motorcycles,” the report observed.

NYT cited three specific reports to prove this point. One similar case was a July 19, 2016 bombing by US special forces of three presumed Islamic State militant groups’ staging areas in northern Syria. Original reports were of 85 fighters killed. Rather, the dead were 120 growers and other townies.

Another illustration was a November 2015 attack in Ramadi, Iraq, caused by a man seen dragging “ an unknown heavy object” into an Islamic State position. The “ object”, a review plant, was a child, who failed in the strike.

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Today In History( 20 DECEMBER, 1989)
Next Article Philippines typhoon death toll hits 375
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your Trusted Source for Accurate and Timely Updates!

Our commitment to accuracy, impartiality, and delivering breaking news as it happens has earned us the trust of a vast audience.
268kLike
90.7kFollow
17.9kFollow
4.9kSubscribe
1kFollow

Popular Posts

Today In History (14 JANUARY,2011)

By SRI NewsDesk

World’s Most Peaceful Country 2023- Global Peace Index

By SRI NewsDesk

Today In History(07 FEBRUARY, 1913)

By SRI NewsDesk

You Might Also Like

Wagner vs Africa Corps: The future of Russian paramilitaries in Mali
AfricaNEWS

Wagner vs Africa Corps: The Future of Russian Paramilitaries in Mali

This month, the Russian mercenary outfit Wagner Group announced its total withdrawal from Mali, claiming it had…

By SRI NewsDesk
G7 leaders meet in Canada hoping to avoid Trump clash
NEWSWorld

G7 Leaders Meet In Canada Hoping To Avoid Trump Clash

Group of Seven (G7) leaders will gather in the Canadian Rockies starting on Sunday amid…

By SRI NewsDesk
Scarcity of water in Central Jail Muzaffarabad needs to resolve
KashmirNEWS

Scarcity Of Water In Central Jail Muzaffarabad Needs To Resolve

Muzaffarabad, (Parliament Times) : The Central Jail has begun to present a scene of Karbala, a…

By SRI NewsDesk
Why India refused to join SCO condemnation of Israel’s attacks on Iran
Middle EastNEWS

Why India Refused To Join SCO Condemnation Of Israel’s Attacks On Iran

New Delhi, India — India has distanced itself from the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation’s (SCO) condemnation of…

By SRI NewsDesk
Show More
SRI
Facebook X-twitter Youtube Instagram Linkedin

About Us

 

Strategic Research Institute (SRI) is a non-partisan, non-political and non-governmental research organization based in Islamabad. 

Top Categories
  • BLOG
  • INFOGRAPHICS
  • NEWS
  • RESEARCH ARTICLES
Useful Links
  • ABOUT SRI
  • CONTACT US
  • WRITE FOR US
Copyright © 2025
Strategic Research institute
 
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?